- Basic Concepts
- Models and Schemas
- Column Types
- Collections
- Filtering
- Groups
- Inverting Filters (not)
- Back references
- Advanced Filters
- Creating Your Own Filter
- Default Filters
- Relationships
- Data Decorators
- Data Storage and Typing
- Repositories
- Data Typing and Data Transforms
- Advanced Techniques
- Joins and Intersections
- Aggregates
- Model Events
- Custard Commands
- Updating DocBlock comments
- Migrating Schemas
- Common Patterns and Anti-Patterns
- Inter-Model Strategies
Joins and Intersections
Any developer familiar with SQL will know just how often the need arises to use a join query to link several tables together in order to filter on columns in those tables or to aggregate their values. Stem provides a similar concept through joins and intersections. In fact if using a repository that supports it (e.g. MySql) join queries may ultimately be used.
Joins and intersections are similar to one another, however they're not exactly the same, and it is important to know their differences.
Joins allow you to:
- use the parent collection as a group index, aggregating columns in the matching rows of the child collection, and pull them up into the parent collection for selection or filtering
- prefetch data needed to populate the models of a relationship of models in the first collection.
Intersections differ only in that they remove rows in the parent collection where a matching row can't be found in a child collection
You can join or intersect a collection with any number of other collections, and those collections can themselves be joined with others. There is no limit to the depth of nested joins, except perhaps any imposed by your repository.
Joins can handle 99% of selection scenarios you'll need in a standard enterprise application and their real benefit is that they allow those complex selections to be unit tested without requiring a connected database.
Basic syntax
To join we call the joinWith()
function on the collection. The arguments are in turn:
- The child collection - This is the collection that will be joined with our parents collection
- The source column - The column in the parent collection containing a value to find in the child collection
- The destination column - The column in the child collecting containing the value to find from the parent collection
- Pull Ups - Optionally an array of column names to 'pull up' from the inner collection to the outer collection. This makes these columns available for selection or filtering
- Auto Hydration - Optionally a bool indicating if the join should be auto-hydrated.
To perform an intersection we call intersectWith()
with exactly the same arguments.
Join Example
Imagine you had a collection of contacts and a collection of companies. And that there is a one to many relationship between the company and the contacts. Through the use of the joinWith() function, we will be able to attach company information to our contacts, by joining each of them using their CompanyID.
$contacts = Contact::all()
->joinWith(
Company::all(),
"CompanyID",
"CompanyID",
[
"CompanyName",
"City" => "CompanyCity"
]
);
Contact::all() provides us with our parent collection, in this instance it is a collection of all of our contacts. Company::all() is our child collection, this is just a collection of all of our companies. "CompanyID" is how we are joining the two tables to each other, that is, when CompanyID in the source collection equals CompanyID in the target collection we will attach the data on. Pull ups The array are the columns that we want to pull up into the parent collection. As can be seen the fields that we have chosen were "CompanyName" and "City", however as there was already a City field in Contacts, we have opted to rename it using "City" => "CompanyCity".
Once this has been performed, our $contacts collection will be able to access both "CompanyName" and "CompanyCity". However, if a contact has no CompanyID, the pulled up fields will have null values. This is because there will be no appropriate company information to pull in. Due to this, collections will always remain the same size after the joinWith() function has completed.
Unlike the Left Join in SQL, the collection will not grow in size. This is because we apply a final group by on the outermost collection.
If our contact model contained the fields: Forename, Surname and City, once our join with operation is complete each object inside the $contacts will have access to those three fields, plus the two additional ones that we pulled up: CompanyName and CompanyCity. Allowing us to reference the pulled up columns in the same way
foreach($contacts as $contact)
{
print $contact->Forename; // Prints this contacts Forename
print $contact->Surname; // Prints this contacts Surname
print $contact->CompanyName; // Prints this contacts connected CompanyName
print $contact->CompanyCity; // Prints this contacts connected CompanyCity
...
Filtering on the child collection would allow us to retain all of our contacts, while only pulling in company information for those companies that satisfied the filters criteria.
$contacts = Contact::all(); // All of the contacts
$companies = Company::find(
new Equals("City", "Belfast") // Companies whose City is `Belfast`
);
$contacts->joinWith( // Join all our contacts with
$companies, // our companies collection
"CompanyID", // join using the CompanyID
"CompanyID",
[ // Pull up
"CompanyName", // CompanyName
"City" => "CompanyCity" // City as CompanyCity
]
);
Note that this is different to filtering after the join. Filtering after the join would change the size of our collection, as it would remove records from the collection that didn't meet the filters criteria.
As stated above, applying our filter after the join would reduce our $contacts list down to the contacts whose company was situated in Belfast. This can be seen below.
$contacts = Contact::all(); // All of the contacts
$companies = Company::all(); // All of the companies
$contacts->joinWith( // Join all our contacts with
$companies, // all of our companies
"CompanyID", // join using the CompanyID
"CompanyID",
[ // Pull up
"CompanyName", // CompanyName
"City" => "CompanyCity" // City as CompanyCity
]
)->filter( // Filter the collection down to only those contacts whose:
new Equals("CompanyCity", "Belfast") // CompanyCity is equal to 'Belfast'
);
Intersection Example
Again, imagine we have the same collection of contacts and companies. Now, imagine you wanted to get a collection of only contacts whose company location is in a particular city. Here's the code:
$contacts = Contact::all()
->intersectWith(
Company::find(
new Equals("City", "Craigavon")
),
"CompanyID",
"CompanyID");
Let's break this down a little:
Contact::all() retrieves all contacts. intersectWith is the function we call to filter out rows that don't appear in a target collection. Company::find(new Equals("City", "Craigavon")) returns a collection of companies in the Craigavon city. "CompanyID" is the name of the joining field in both the parent and target collections.
Sometimes it can be easier to setup the collections first as variables and then do the intersection:
// Find qualifying companies first
$companies = Company::find(new Equals("City", "Craigavon"));
// Now intersect those with contacts to find the contacts of those
// companies.
$contacts = Contact::all();
$contacts->intersectWith(
$companies,
"CompanyID",
"CompanyID");
It can be helpful to think of the final two parameters as the 'ON' clause of a standard SQL join. Just like an ON clause they can be any field in either model, however unlike an ON clause you can only have one constraint.
Complex Joins
While it can be quite hard at first to visualise what's happening here joins and intersections can be easier to create than complex SQL join queries. A join query generally needs thought about all in one go however with an intersection you can build in stages. Define the simplest 'inner' collection first then work outwards intersecting with each outer collection. As you go you can count and verify the number of rows.
Once you realise how easy it is to nest joins you realise it can let you achieve quite powerful results that are difficult to hand craft in SQL. For example let's modify our example above a little. Now we want to find contacts who belong to company where the number of contacts that company has is greater than 10. Not a trivial query in SQL but here's the code in Stem:
// Select companies with more than 10 people
$companies = Company::all() // Select all companies
->intersectWith( // but intersect with
Contact:all() // all contacts
->addAggregateColumn(new Count("Contacts")), // count the number of contacts per company
"CompanyID", // join using the CompanyID field
"CompanyID",
["CountOfContacts"] // pull up the count into the company collection
)
->filter(new GreaterThan("CountOfContacts", 10)); // filter on the count of contacts (previously pulled up)
// As before now we have a list of companies with more than 10 people
// in them we can intersect with contacts to find who they are:
$contacts = Contact::all();
$contacts->intersectWith(
$companies,
"CompanyID",
"CompanyID");
This time we've involved an aggregate on the inner most Contact collection and then pulled that aggregate value up into the Company collection allowing us to filter it for those with a value > 10. Finally we intersect that collection with the list of contacts to find the actual contacts.
Shorthand syntax - dot notation.
Where relationships have been defined filtering, sorting and aggregating support a dot notation syntax which can setup the join for you and make the expression more legible. Here's an alternative version of the first example:
// Use dot notation to infer the correct join.
$contacts = Contact::find(new Equals("Company.City", "Craigavon"));
That's a lot easier to understand for most people.
Here's the second example redrafted:
// Select companies with more than 10 people
$companies = Company::all()
->addAggregateColumn(new Count("Contacts.ContactID" => "CountOfContacts")),
->filter(new GreaterThan("CountOfContacts", 10));
// As before now we have a list of companies with more than 10 people
// in them we can intersect with contacts to find who they are:
$contacts = Contact::all();
$contacts->intersectWith(
$companies,
"CompanyID",
"CompanyID");
The dot notation here is in the aggregate column. By using it we automatically get an join with a contact collection.
Note that we specify an alias manually for the aggregate otherwise its automatic alias would have been the cumbersome CountOfContactsContactID!
Grouping
If you aggregate on a collection involved inside an join, that collection will automatically be grouped using the column name of the constraint on the join.
Grouping is also be applied to the outermost collection by its unique identifier column name ensuring the collection only outputs one model per ID.
Pull ups
In a SQL join query you can select from any of the tables involved however you need to be careful to alias any column names that might be duplicated. Both to avoid these types of conflicts and because you can intersect between collections from different repositories you need to specify the names of columns you need to 'pull up' into the parent collection.
Once pulled up you can treat them like real columns filtering, sorting, aggregating and grouping on them just like any other. This again can make complex groups and aggregates more straightforward. For example it's possible to group an inner collection to calculate an aggregate, pull it up to the outer collection and then group the outer collection using that aggregate.
Pull ups are listed as the forth argument to intersectWith
. You can
provide an array of just column names, or if you want to alias the
columns you can provide an associative array of original to alias names.
Auto hydration
In it's normal mode an join serves to filter a collection for matching records; the actual data (bar pull ups) in the join is not selected or used in any way. However if when writing the join you know that you will very likely to use that data in the following code you should try to auto hydrate the joins.
For example using our example above, let's say you wanted to loop through the contacts matching our selection and do something with their related company models:
// Find qualifying companies first
$companies = Company::find(new Equals("City", "Craigavon"));
// Now intersect those with contacts to find the contacts of those
// companies.
$contacts = Contact::all();
$contacts->intersectWith(
$companies,
"CompanyID",
"CompanyID");
foreach($contacts as $contact){
// By accessing the relationship to `Company` we will cause another
// hit on our repository usually at high cost of network overhead.
print $contact->Company->CompanyName;
}
To avoid hitting th repository again for each record in the contacts
collection we can modify our collection by passing true as the next
argument to intersectWith
:
// Find qualifying companies first
$companies = Company::find(new Equals("City", "Craigavon"));
// Now intersect those with contacts to find the contacts of those
// companies.
$contacts = Contact::all();
$contacts->intersectWith(
$companies,
"CompanyID",
"CompanyID",
true);
foreach($contacts as $contact){
// Because of the auto-hydration accessing the relationship to
// `Company` will no longer cause another hit on our repository.
print $contact->Company->CompanyName;
}
When using dot notation auto-hydration is automatically enabled for joins it creates.